Check out the response from a Ph.D., big pharma friend of mine..
Tony.
I have to say that I do not know much about this. Just a
few random thoughts.
On the anti-bioweapon side:
1) I am not convinced that the current China virus was
created in a lab. Chinese dietary and animal raising
habits have been creating weird virus mutations for a
long time and I am not sure how anyone could tell the
difference between an accidental mutation and a
deliberate modification. These were not noticed in the
past because the Chinese have a habit of killing large
numbers of people in one way or another and it is
only recently that we have had much contact with
them. MERS, SARS, etc are only the most
recent examples. Wearing N95 masks to prevent
infection has always been popular in the far east and
it is not just because of the pollution.
This does not mean that it did not escape from
a lab. The biological weapons laboratory in
Wuhan may well have been investigating this as
a possible bioweapon (perhaps for purely defensive
purposes) but the Chinese are as careless about
laboratory safety as they are about everything else.
2) It does not really make sense as a bioweapon.
It seems to mainly kill old or immunocompromised
people. That would, obviously, be useless against
the Chinese because they do not care. It has gone
a long way toward destroying the American economy
but I, at least, would not have predicted the self-
destructive hysteria that we have seen here. Perhaps
I am naive.
3) RE: 5G. This, like every other wireless technology,
is potentially dangerous. However, the otherwise
inexplicable push to get this implemented seems to
be more related to its usefulness in creating a total
surveillance society rather than its use as a bioweapon.
Any toxicity may be just collateral damage.
On the pro-binary-bioweapon side, we mainly have
suspicion.
1) I have not seen any credible research on the
interaction between 5G and virus toxicity. It is still
too soon to assume that it has been suppressed.
2) I saw an article in some newspaper (I think it
was USA today) which said something to the
effect that ". . there is one thing that you can
permanently remove from your concern list. There
is no interaction between COVID-19 and 5G . ."
Of course, there was no evidence for this extreme
position. On the princlple that we should not believe
something until it has been officially denied, we
should, perhaps, be worried.
This does not, however, mean that any such
interaction is deliberate. Again, it may just be
collateral damage.
To sum up, I do not have any idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment