Thursday, June 26, 2025

New York Times HISTORY of "discraced" Journalists....GROK gives a synopsis

 Recent information on journalists being fired from *The New York Times. Historical cases included.


 

Below is a summary of notable instances where journalists left or were fired from *The New York Times*, focusing on high-profile cases and patterns, with an emphasis on verified information.


### Notable Historical Cases of Journalists Leaving *The New York Times*
1. **Donald G. McNeil Jr. (2021)**  
   - **Reason**: Resigned after controversy over using a racial slur during a 2019 *New York Times*-sponsored student trip to Peru. The Daily Beast reported the incident, prompting over 150 staffers to sign a letter expressing outrage over the initial lenient response (a reprimand). McNeil apologized, stating he used the slur in a discussion about its use by another student, but acknowledged it was inappropriate regardless of context. He resigned under pressure from editors Dean Baquet and Joe Kahn, who cited a loss of newsroom trust.[](https://www.npr.org/2021/02/06/964618301/two-prominent-new-york-times-journalists-depart-over-past-behavior)[](https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/01/media/donald-mcneil-speaks-out/index.html)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/01/business/donald-mcneil-new-york-times-racial-slur.html)
   - **Context**: McNeil was a veteran science reporter, pivotal in the *Times*’ COVID-19 coverage, making his departure significant. He later published a lengthy defense, criticizing *Times* leadership for mishandling the situation and alleging misrepresentation by The Daily Beast.[](https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/01/media/donald-mcneil-speaks-out/index.html)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/01/business/donald-mcneil-new-york-times-racial-slur.html)

2. **Andy Mills (2021)**  
   - **Reason**: Resigned following scrutiny over his role in the flawed *Caliphate* podcast and past allegations of inappropriate behavior toward female colleagues at WNYC, his previous employer. After *The New York Times* retracted parts of *Caliphate* due to fabricated accounts by a key source, Mills faced renewed criticism for prior incidents, including giving a colleague a back rub and pouring a drink on another’s head. He cited a “pressure campaign” as making his position untenable.[](https://www.npr.org/2021/02/06/964618301/two-prominent-new-york-times-journalists-depart-over-past-behavior)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/05/business/media/donald-mcneil-andy-mills-leave-nyt.html)[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2021/02/05/new-york-times-donald-mcneil-andy-mills-depart/)
   - **Context**: The *Caliphate* fallout, combined with resurfaced allegations, led to his exit, highlighting issues of workplace conduct and editorial accountability.

3. **Lauren Wolfe (2021)**  
   - **Reason**: Fired as a freelance editor after tweeting she had “chills” watching Joe Biden’s plane land before his inauguration, which drew accusations of bias from conservative critics. The *Times* claimed her dismissal was not solely due to the tweet, but Wolfe argued it was the primary reason, accusing the paper of smearing her reputation. She later defended her stance, arguing journalists can have biases while maintaining fairness in reporting.[](https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/jan/25/lauren-wolfe-new-york-times-editor-fired-biden-tweet)[](https://www.foxnews.com/media/fired-new-york-times-editor-newspaper-dismissal-reputation)[](https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-lauren-wolfe-biased-journalist)
   - **Context**: The incident sparked debate about social media policies and perceived political neutrality, with critics noting inconsistent enforcement (e.g., reporter Glenn Thrush was not fired after 2017 misconduct allegations).[](https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/jan/25/lauren-wolfe-new-york-times-editor-fired-biden-tweet)

4. **James Bennet (2020)**  
   - **Reason**: Resigned as editorial page editor after backlash over publishing a controversial op-ed by Senator Tom Cotton titled “Send in the Troops,” advocating military action against 2020 protests. Over 800 staff members protested, arguing the piece endangered Black staff and contained misinformation. Publisher A.G. Sulzberger cited a “breakdown in editing processes” as the reason for Bennet’s exit.[](https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jun/07/new-york-times-editor-resigns-tom-cotton-oped-protests)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/07/business/media/james-bennet-resigns-nytimes-op-ed.html)[](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9230137/Top-New-York-Times-reporter-RESIGNS-apologizes-bad-judgement-use-N-word.html)
   - **Context**: The resignation reflected tensions over editorial standards and the influence of internal and social media pressure on newsroom decisions.

5. **Bari Weiss (2020)**  
   - **Reason**: Resigned as an opinion editor, citing an “illiberal environment” at the *Times*. In her resignation letter, she accused the paper of stifling diverse viewpoints, alleging bullying by colleagues who labeled her a racist and bigot. She claimed Twitter had become the paper’s “ultimate editor,” shaping stories to appease narrow audiences.[](https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter)[](https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2020-07-14/bari-weiss-new-york-times-resignation)[](https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/14/media/bari-weiss-resigns-new-york-times/index.html)
   - **Context**: Weiss’s exit fueled debates about “cancel culture” and journalistic freedom, with supporters praising her critique and detractors arguing she exaggerated her grievances.

6. **Jayson Blair (2003)**  
   - **Reason**: Resigned after an investigation revealed widespread plagiarism and fabrication in his articles. The *Times* published a 7,239-word front-page story detailing his journalistic fraud, including filing false reports from locations he never visited and lifting material from other sources.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayson_Blair)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/us/correcting-the-record-times-reporter-who-resigned-leaves-long-trail-of-deception.html)
   - **Context**: The scandal was a low point for the *Times*, prompting internal reforms and damaging public trust. Blair later wrote a memoir, *Burning Down My Masters’ House*, discussing his bipolar disorder and race dynamics at the paper.


### Patterns and Observations

- **Reasons for Departures**: Firings or resignations at *The New York Times* often stem from controversies involving workplace conduct (e.g., McNeil, Mills), perceived bias (e.g., Wolfe), editorial decisions (e.g., Bennet), or journalistic integrity (e.g., Blair). These cases highlight the paper’s sensitivity to public and internal criticism, especially in the social media era.
- **Social Media Influence**: Several cases (Weiss, Wolfe, Bennet) underscore how social media amplifies controversies, with Twitter (now X) often cited as a driver of internal and external pressure.[](https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter)[](https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2020-07-14/bari-weiss-new-york-times-resignation)[](https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/14/media/bari-weiss-resigns-new-york-times/index.html)
- **Internal Tensions**: Staff protests and letters (e.g., McNeil, Bennet) indicate a newsroom grappling with issues of race, bias, and workplace culture, often spilling into public view.[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2021/02/12/donald-mcneil-new-york-times-fallout/)[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2021/02/05/new-york-times-donald-mcneil-andy-mills-depart/)[](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9230137/Top-New-York-Times-reporter-RESIGNS-apologizes-bad-judgement-use-N-word.html)
- **Inconsistent Discipline**: Critics have noted disparities in how the *Times* handles misconduct. For example, Glenn Thrush retained his job after 2017 sexual misconduct allegations with a two-month suspension, while Wolfe was fired over a single tweet.[](https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/jan/25/lauren-wolfe-new-york-times-editor-fired-biden-tweet)
- **Economic Layoffs**: While not specific to journalists, *The New York Times* laid off over 100 employees by 2010 during the Great Recession, reflecting broader industry challenges. Recent X posts suggest budget-related layoffs may continue, with one user claiming 700 staff were cut last year, though this lacks corroboration from reliable sources.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times)

### Current Sentiment (2025)
- No verified reports of recent firings in 2025 have emerged from credible sources. An X post from June 26, 2025, suggests the *Times* may cut staff for budget reasons due to declining readership, but this is speculative and not substantiated by official reports.
- The lack of recent data may indicate a quieter period or underreporting. If you’re seeking specific 2025 incidents, I can search for real-time information if needed.

### Critical Perspective
The *Times* faces ongoing scrutiny for balancing journalistic integrity, workplace culture, and public perception. Cases like McNeil and Bennet suggest a newsroom where internal activism and external criticism can lead to swift leadership decisions, sometimes perceived as reactive or inconsistent. The influence of social media, as Weiss noted, raises questions about whether editorial decisions prioritize appeasing vocal audiences over fostering open debate. Meanwhile, economic pressures, as seen in historical layoffs, reflect broader challenges in print media.[](https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times)

If you’re looking for details on a specific journalist, incident, or timeframe in 2025, please provide more details, and I can tailor the response or conduct a targeted search. Alternatively, I can analyze related X posts or web content for sentiment or additional context.

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Grok says....Trump NO Different than OBAMA's dozen military initiatives without congressional consult

 

 


Barack Obama, during his presidency, authorized several military initiatives without explicit congressional approval, often relying on existing authorizations like the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) or his constitutional powers as commander-in-chief. Below are the key instances based on available information:

1. **Libya Intervention (2011)**:
   - Obama ordered U.S. military forces to participate in a NATO-led intervention in Libya, starting in March 2011, to protect civilians from Muammar Gaddafi’s regime. This involved airstrikes and missile attacks, costing approximately $1.1 billion by September 2011.
   - The administration argued that the operation did not require congressional approval because U.S. forces played a "supporting role" under NATO command, and the actions did not constitute "hostilities" under the War Powers Resolution (1973). This interpretation was controversial, as the operation continued beyond the 60-day limit set by the War Powers Resolution without formal congressional authorization.
   - Critics, including some lawmakers and legal scholars, argued this violated the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution, which requires congressional approval for sustained military engagements. The House rejected a resolution to authorize the operation, yet it continued for about eight months.[](https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/does-the-president-need-congress-to-approve-military-actions-in-iran)[](https://novus2.com/righteouscause/2025/06/21/the-executives-war-obamas-military-actions-without-congressional-approval/)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/world/africa/22powers.html)

2. **Airstrikes Against ISIS in Iraq and Syria (2014–2017)**:
   - Starting in August 2014, Obama authorized airstrikes against the Islamic State (ISIS) in Iraq, later expanding to Syria in September 2014. Over 150 airstrikes were conducted in Iraq within weeks, and the campaign grew to include U.S. special operations forces in Syria by 2015.
   - The administration justified these actions under the 2001 AUMF (targeting al-Qaeda and associated groups) and the 2002 AUMF (Iraq), claiming ISIS was linked to al-Qaeda’s legacy. This legal rationale was criticized as a "stretch," as ISIS had been expelled from al-Qaeda in 2014, and the 2001 AUMF was seen as outdated for new conflicts.
   - Obama did not seek new congressional authorization, despite his stated commitment to work with Congress. In 2015, he submitted a draft AUMF for ISIS, but Congress did not pass it, and operations continued without new approval. Critics, including Yale Law’s Bruce Ackerman, called this a break from constitutional tradition, arguing it lacked both legal and popular legitimacy.[](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/can-obama-wage-war-islamic-state-group-without-congressional-approval)[](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/11/the-perils-of-president-obamas-latest-undeclared-war/413566/)[](https://time.com/3326689/obama-isis-war-powers-bush/)

3. **Drone Strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia (2009–2017)**:
   - Obama significantly expanded the use of drone strikes, authorizing 542 strikes across Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, killing an estimated 3,797 people, including 324–807 civilians. These included controversial "double-tap" strikes targeting first responders and the killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen (2011) without judicial process.
   - These operations were conducted under the 2001 AUMF, with the administration arguing they targeted al-Qaeda affiliates or threats to U.S. security. No specific congressional approval was sought for these strikes, which were criticized for their secrecy, civilian casualties, and expansion of executive power. The muted congressional response contrasted with later scrutiny of similar actions by Obama’s successor.[](https://novus2.com/righteouscause/2025/06/21/the-executives-war-obamas-military-actions-without-congressional-approval/)[](https://x.com/The_Gay_Patriot/status/1936584572226982269)[](https://x.com/The_Gay_Patriot/status/1936585189477466333)

4. **Other Notable Actions**:
   - **Syria (2013)**: Obama initially planned limited missile strikes against the Syrian regime after chemical weapons use but sought congressional approval due to public and political pressure. Congress deferred action, and Obama ultimately pursued a diplomatic solution with Russia to remove Syria’s chemical weapons, avoiding strikes. This was an exception where he sought approval, though no military action occurred.[](https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/does-the-president-need-congress-to-approve-military-actions-in-iran)[](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/obama-will-seek-congressional-approval-any-military-action-against-syria-flna8c11050106)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration)
   - **Horn of Africa (2014)**: Obama authorized drone strikes and operations against al-Qaeda affiliates and Somali pirates, including a task force responding to the 2013 Westgate mall attack in Kenya. These were conducted without specific congressional authorization, often under the 2001 AUMF.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration)

**Context and Criticism**:
- Obama’s actions were often justified by citing the 2001 AUMF, the 2002 AUMF, or his Article II powers as commander-in-chief to respond to imminent threats or protect U.S. personnel. However, critics argued these justifications stretched legal boundaries, undermining the War Powers Resolution and Congress’s constitutional authority to declare war.[](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/can-obama-wage-war-islamic-state-group-without-congressional-approval)[](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/11/the-perils-of-president-obamas-latest-undeclared-war/413566/)[](https://time.com/3326689/obama-isis-war-powers-bush/)
- The War Powers Resolution requires presidents to notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and withdraw forces after 60 days without congressional approval. Obama’s administration frequently reset this clock with new notifications or argued that actions fell outside the resolution’s scope (e.g., Libya).[](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/can-obama-wage-war-islamic-state-group-without-congressional-approval)[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-libya-action-does-not-require-congressional-approval/2011/06/15/AGLttOWH_story.html)
- Congressional response was mixed. Some lawmakers, like Rep. Dennis Kucinich and Sen. Rand Paul, condemned the lack of authorization, while others, particularly during the ISIS campaign, were reluctant to vote on a new AUMF due to political risks.[](https://lee.house.gov/news/articles/obamas-plan-for-military-action-requires-congressional-checks-and-balances)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/world/africa/22powers.html)
- Posts on X reflect ongoing sentiment that Obama’s actions expanded executive power, with some users citing Libya and Syria as key examples of bypassing Congress. These posts, while not conclusive, align with scholarly and legal critiques.[](https://x.com/Aasim0555/status/1936707507751104573)[](https://x.com/WongB69/status/1936763271542866299)[](https://x.com/fendermusicg/status/1936609698209288237)

**Analysis**:
Obama’s military initiatives without congressional approval reflect a broader trend of executive overreach, building on precedents set by prior administrations (e.g., Clinton in Kosovo, Bush in Somalia). His reliance on the 2001 AUMF for new threats like ISIS and drone campaigns was particularly contentious, as it applied a post-9/11 authorization to unrelated conflicts. While Obama campaigned on restoring congressional oversight, his presidency saw a significant expansion of unilateral military actions, drawing criticism for undermining constitutional checks and balances. The lack of consistent congressional pushback, partly due to political divisions and reluctance to take controversial votes, enabled this trend.[](https://time.com/3326689/obama-isis-war-powers-bush/)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/22/world/africa/22powers.html)[](https://aclj.org/national-security/what-powers-does-the-president-have-to-take-military-action-without-congressional-approval)

If you’d like me to dig deeper into any specific initiative or provide further analysis, let me know!

Friday, June 13, 2025

Hundreds per KEY WORD great MEME's from a MEME whisperer ...Political SATIRE...Favoring our Constitution

 

Hundreds per KEY WORD great MEME's from a MEME whisperer


Hundreds by key word per link....
for your quiver AS needed...



https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/tonys-memeskey-word-lies-truth-etc.html

Key word Trump
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-great-memes-key-word.html

Key word Media
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-great-memes-key-word_4.html

Key Word - Muslim, Islam
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-great-memes-key-word_7.html

Key word, CNNhttps://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2018/01/exconservatives-awesome-memes-key.html
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/08/key-word-racism-race-black-colorex.html

Key word HOMOSEXUAL
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/godmademan-devolved-to-liberal-then.html

https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-awesome-memes-key-word.html
Key word - Black, Race, black privilege, etc

https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservatives-awesome-memeskey-word.html

Key word, OBAMA
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-conservatives-awesome-memes-key-word.html


Key word - Clinton
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservatives-awesome-memes-key.html

Key word - Communism
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2018/04/exconservative-awesome-memeskey-word_21.html

Metaphors and MEME's ....Why the Left is Triggered when We the People USE them

  A visual metaphor is the representation of a person, place, thing, or idea by means of a visual image that suggests a particular association or point of similarity. It's also known as pictorial metaphor and analogical juxtaposition.

https://comunistmanifesto101.blogspot.com/2019/07/metaphors-and-memes-why-left-is.html

https://comunistmanifesto101.blogspot.com/2019/07/metaphors-and-memes-why-left-is.html

l




















Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Critics, speaking Loud...Never seeing the Forest for the TREEs..."When good people do nothing...GROK.COM speaks

 

Please NOTE...

 

With emphasis on critics....often negative...I often wonder..if those SQUEAL the loudest ever took note to this fact.....

GOOD people....presumably even those who KNOW BETTER often refuse to participate in the ugly work of politics...

for that REASON..it's ugly...so...we DEFAULT TO..

UGLY people dominating where good people, smarter, wiser are too busy "becoming successful' rarely noting the downfall of law and order until THEIR business gets burned and looted to the ground
 
Grok.com suggests
Critics often lean negative because it’s easier to point out flaws than to create or risk something themselves. Negativity grabs attention, establishes authority, and requires less vulnerability than building or supporting something. Many lack the courage or commitment to act on their critiques, as risking failure or exposure demands more than just voicing complaints. It’s a low-stakes position: criticize without accountability. Meanwhile, those who risk and do are too busy navigating real challenges to indulge in endless fault-finding. This dynamic isn’t universal, but it’s common enough to notice. 

Tuesday, June 3, 2025

Hollywood's IMAGE Creators.....Shaping YOUR Belief System....Suckers BET!

Democrats & Hollytwood never did anything...other than the making of an Illusion of Reality displayed..

You cannot expect them to be IN REALITY....they live an ILLUSION>

Never State words YOU WROTE
Never act without DIRECTION
Never go anywhere without your publicist whose job is it to spin.


When "considering" what HOLLYWOOD says about ANYTHING....
 
Allow your thinking to understand just who "they" are

Fiction Writers....taking truth and twisting it beyond recognition.

ACTORS....those who don't even speak that which is NOT written FOR THEM. 
   Knowing no matter the danger they role presents to them TODAY...
they will never be ACTUALLY harmed...as long as they FOLLOW direction.

Directors...those who love to tell people WHAT to DO.

Producers...Those who find the money, provide the money to those who don't know truth, who never know consequences or will ever look inward...

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Liberals vs Conservative...Contrast, Compare...Logic, Reason and Deduction is not a LAW FIRM.

 Conservatives deal with the law as is or should be justly.



  Liberals deal with the court of public opinion and mob rule

Conservatives deal with evidence and documents

  

as it should be. 

 Liberals deal with accusations or hearsay as they want it to be. 

 

 

 

 Conservatives uphold tradition and values as proven by history. Liberals embrace change and trends as dictated by the moment. 


 Conservatives prioritize individual responsibility as the foundation of freedom

Liberals advocate collective action as the path to equity.

 

 Conservatives respect borders and sovereignty as essential for order

 Liberals promote open borders and globalism as ideals of unity.

 

 Conservatives base policy on reason and measurable outcomes. Liberals shape policy through emotion and narrative appeal. 

 

 Conservatives defend free speech as a bedrock of truth. Liberals curtail speech to align with prevailing social norms. 

  Liberals rely on government intervention to enforce fairness. 

 

 Conservatives judge actions by objective standards and accountability.

  Liberals assess actions through subjective intent and context. 

 

 Conservatives seek justice through due process and impartiality. Liberals pursue justice via activism and public pressure.