Monday, March 23, 2015

Liberals and Other than Conservative EAT, LIVE & BREATH, Jealousy and Envy

In today's Other than Conservative...you ...those ducks who quack.....like a duck...
Corrupted by left wing Jealousy and Envy...


If this was a major league baseball team IMAGINE being jealous, envious of the top three players in the line-up...who hit 80% of all the hits.....


are ridiculed because of their success..
Conservatives "get even" by succeeding
Queen for a Day....1956-63  The start of celebrating BEING VICTIM
Liberals "get even" by PERVERTING the word fair...then claiming they are a victim
Deal made with the DEVIL...the Meaning of the word "LIBERAL"
600 two hour programs over three years
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/tony-venuti/2010/10/06/tony-venuti--ex-conservative-radio-show 

Tony's AWESOME memes
http://presumptivephilospher.blogspot.com/2015/04/tonys-awesome-memes.html

Friday, March 20, 2015

Starbucks....Racing to the TOP...Lets start with the False Narrative....shall we?

Lets start with the false narrative....shall we....

Good, now thank your forefathers for the pain that came with the opportunity YOU now have....co-opted pharses = a dog whistle.
Tyranny OF THE Offended, Indeed.  "Sorry Charlie"...GET OVER yourself!


                  "You didn't build it, NOR were YOU there"


PS...recall the Department of Education initiative of "The RACE to the TOP"
Racing to the Top, Race to the Top = Dog Whistle...


Make NO mistake on their WORD usage.....Suckers!  #racetothetop

#trickbags
Once in it....Hard to get out of it




Wednesday, March 18, 2015

The Presumptive Philosopher: I "Went to College"...the NEW "Made in Japan" #we...

The Presumptive Philosopher: I "Went to College"...the NEW "Made in Japan" #we...: Remember "Made in Japan"....always indicated CHEAP stuff? #wenttocollege  the NEW Made in Japan The New "Made in Japa...

Religion vs Science ..Perverted....we now believe science and prove religion...SUCKER!

Be quick to remind Libs/Islamists incarnate.....that once upon a time...



You BELIEVED religion....see FAITH
You PROVED science......see WHAT IS

now...thanks to evil manifested in liberalism....expects us...
to believe SCIENCE and
to prove RELIGION.

..Perverted thinking....never knowing....always FEELING
PS.
Perverted Reality.  Down is now up, Wrong is now right, Isn't is now IS

Consensus is NOT science...by any stretch of a liberal's imagination...\
The study, “Religious Understandings of Science (RUS),” was conducted by sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund and presented today in Chicago during the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference. Ecklund is the Autrey Professor of Sociology and director of Rice’s Religion and Public Life Program.
“We found that nearly 50 percent of evangelicals believe that science and religion can work together and support one another,” Ecklund said. “That’s in contrast to the fact that only 38 percent of Americans feel that science and religion can work in collaboration.”
The study also found that 18 percent of scientists attended weekly religious services, compared with 20 percent of the general U.S. population; 15 percent consider themselves very religious (versus 19 percent of the general U.S. population); 13.5 percent read religious texts weekly (compared with 17 percent of the U.S. population); and 19 percent pray several times a day (versus 26 percent of the U.S. population).
- See more at: http://news.rice.edu/2014/02/16/misconceptions-of-science-and-religion-found-in-new-study/#sthash.2T1LG9CM.dpuf
http://news.rice.edu/2014/02/16/misconceptions-of-science-and-religion-found-in-new-study/

The study, “Religious Understandings of Science (RUS),” was conducted by sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund and presented today in Chicago during the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference. Ecklund is the Autrey Professor of Sociology and director of Rice’s Religion and Public Life Program.
“We found that nearly 50 percent of evangelicals believe that science and religion can work together and support one another,” Ecklund said. “That’s in contrast to the fact that only 38 percent of Americans feel that science and religion can work in collaboration.”
The study also found that 18 percent of scientists attended weekly religious services, compared with 20 percent of the general U.S. population; 15 percent consider themselves very religious (versus 19 percent of the general U.S. population); 13.5 percent read religious texts weekly (compared with 17 percent of the U.S. population); and 19 percent pray several times a day (versus 26 percent of the U.S. population).
- See more at: http://news.rice.edu/2014/02/16/misconceptions-of-science-and-religion-found-in-new-study/#sthash.2T1LG9CM.dpuf
http://presumptivephilospher.blogspot.com/2015/04/tonys-awesome-memes.html
The study, “Religious Understandings of Science (RUS),” was conducted by sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund and presented today in Chicago during the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference. Ecklund is the Autrey Professor of Sociology and director of Rice’s Religion and Public Life Program.
“We found that nearly 50 percent of evangelicals believe that science and religion can work together and support one another,” Ecklund said. “That’s in contrast to the fact that only 38 percent of Americans feel that science and religion can work in collaboration.”
The study also found that 18 percent of scientists attended weekly religious services, compared with 20 percent of the general U.S. population; 15 percent consider themselves very religious (versus 19 percent of the general U.S. population); 13.5 percent read religious texts weekly (compared with 17 percent of the U.S. population); and 19 percent pray several times a day (versus 26 percent of the U.S. population).
- See more at: http://news.rice.edu/2014/02/16/misconceptions-of-science-and-religion-found-in-new-study/#sthash.2T1LG9CM.dpuf

The study, “Religious Understandings of Science (RUS),” was conducted by sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund and presented today in Chicago during the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference. Ecklund is the Autrey Professor of Sociology and director of Rice’s Religion and Public Life Program.
“We found that nearly 50 percent of evangelicals believe that science and religion can work together and support one another,” Ecklund said. “That’s in contrast to the fact that only 38 percent of Americans feel that science and religion can work in collaboration.”
The study also found that 18 percent of scientists attended weekly religious services, compared with 20 percent of the general U.S. population; 15 percent consider themselves very religious (versus 19 percent of the general U.S. population); 13.5 percent read religious texts weekly (compared with 17 percent of the U.S. population); and 19 percent pray several times a day (versus 26 percent of the U.S. population).
- See more at: http://news.rice.edu/2014/02/16/misconceptions-of-science-and-religion-found-in-new-study/#sthash.2T1LG9CM.dpuf

Friday, March 13, 2015

Stock Market & the Economy...the Perverse Incentive

The Perversion of our economic system...STARTED with the STOCK Market?

Why is that you ask? (or not)


The "boss" of a business is ITs customers.....you don't satisfy your customer....you will see loss of business...



Once you ENTER the Stock Market....your NEW boss...is YOUR stock holders.....



A perverse incentive away from the people you serve, becoming WHORES to those who invest IN YOU....."don't BITE the hand that Feeds YOU"...


If you play the stock market (notice the word play) you better think of it like VEGAS..."what can I afford to lose"....otherwise...you are FOOLish

Thursday, March 12, 2015

I am MONEY, I PRINT the MONEY....Trillions in debt....so....? Sew buttons!

Someone asked me..."How can we continue to give billions of dollars to Countries while USA is in debt ...Trillions of Dollars...

A simple answer....picture speaks volumes..

Rated for 15,000 impressions per hour


Quantified Easing....explained

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Tony's ON AIR again-LIVE-aLIVE..! March 19 2pm EST America's THINK SHOW

America's THINK SHOW- Talk being cheapened by an OVER-SUPPLY
Tony's ON again....
LimoCrat sissies hanging out with the thugOcrats
Stirring the soup up live....CPR Network.. My show starts up again March 19, 2015.....

2pm EST Mother taught me right from wrong...the pop-CULT-ure got to me first....the lessons learned..

I will be MAN-HANDLING Liberal white sissies and the Liberal black thugs they suck up to....that make up rhe Demon Democrat MOB
Liberal Blacks...key word "liberal"....black (not a color) thugsLimocr

 listen to me here.. www.cprworldwidemedia.com

Please like our page
https://www.facebook.com/cprworldwidemedia

I bring light into the shadows of the Pop-CULT-ure...



"It's THE Culture, stupid, simple...

Listen to me weekly on the CPR Network....

I will be hitting on all the ISMs that make for victims.....propelling the pop-CULT-ure forward...



Enjoy a show from the past.
Having Circum Navigated the Pop Culture...I share with you...
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/tony-venuti/2010/10/06/tony-venuti--ex-conservative-radio-show




On The Border with Sheriff Joe
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1183079752921&l=2960210296274686049

           http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/right-side-patriots/


Monday, March 9, 2015

I "Went to College"...the NEW "Made in Japan" #wenttocollege

Remember "Made in Japan"....always indicated CHEAP stuff?
#wenttocollege  the NEW Made in Japan

The New "Made in Japan" is "wenttocollege"

UC IRVINE student vote to take down OUR FLAG

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-american-flag--ban-uc-irvine-20150306-story.html
The "adults in the room" have vetoed this attempt



UC Irvine’s Student Government Vetoes Controversial U.S. Flag Ban 

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2015/03/07/uc-irvines-student-government-vetoes-controversial-u-s-flag-ban/


My son a professor at SOU sent me this....so demoralized are MANY in "academia" watching IN SILENCE, as this must be the price paid to BE paid.

Political IN-correctness run amuck.....for so very long....below...is a full staff directory please send email or phone call rejecting this as anti-american....please let me know if and when you make a call or send an email.....
might be a good idea to copy whatever note you may write to the staff so that I can make That GREAT letter available for cut and paste...etc.

Push, Push....PULL!

Administration
Eric Baird
Interim Vice President for Development
Interim Executive Director, SOU Foundation (541) 552-6129
bairder@sou.edu
Lisa Purcell
Executive Assistant
to the Vice President of Development (541) 552-6127
purcelll@sou.edu
Alumni Relations and Annual Giving
Mike Beagle
Director of Alumni Relations & Annual Giving (541) 552-6874


Southern Oregon University Foundation - 1250 Siskiyou Blvd - Ashland, OR 97520 - 

Tel:(541)552-6127 - Fax:(541)552-6126 - SOUFoundation@sou.edu

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

If ONLY I wasn't WHO I am....But because I AM....MANY pay attention Survived Hell - being Liberal.

The Life of a Liberal is simply the default position for all children...for all civilization....
 UNTIL they grow up.  Mature, become civilized, seek out that which is virtuous because we understand the commands from all of Nature, God...synonymous in my mind. 


Does Nature serve MAN or does MAN serve Nature?



Am I  because of who I am...or in spite of who I am?

Back in the day when children feared and respect Ma......she would say to me..."you're so much like me."  I have come to learn that she knew me, cause she new herself.....but of the Male variety...supercharged...hypa charged....

"You do dam well what you please, Anthony...period!"  It was good that many things pleased me...including good things...BUT...if it didn't please Tony.....wasn't happenen.
Been there, don't that.


..Liberalism is all about "Anthony, you do dam well what you feel like doing".....she would go on...."don't look at me like that...you know dam well what I am saying...you tell me yes, ma this and yes ma that....and go on to do exactly how you feel."....Listen Son.....I am responsible to make sure you are self sufficient....and are not dependent on anyone....and until you are out of this house...you will follow my rules...".....replied always...Ma...Ma...yes...Ma...geez ma....why you so....(risk taking at this point...if she turned it was to go get the broom, or the spatula.....I knew to shut up)

Ma, taught us right from wrong...but geez....being wrong was simply so much fun.....I mean growing up through all of the fifties...."don't look in this hole"....a scene from a cartoon...taught us NOT being able to do something was more fun than having permission to do something...

I AM the pop culture....I am the result of the pop culture....all that I am, all that I understand is OF the pop culture....

In the days of a child....a child will often know, but not know what it knows....I started my living thesis of pop-culture, victim-hood and the failure of America with an intuitive...
I developed a knack for what I have coined intuitive research.  Putting ones self not only in the shoes of another ....but in the mind of another....(not easy to do), one,....two...I would use the logical progression of thought to come to some kind of understanding with what IS...IS 
    I have since learned that Einstein had a unique knack of projecting out his research without actual research...it has been this and many more points that I would marry up my intuitive understanding tied down by the likes coming from those of great regard that reinforces "what I think I know."

My earliest articulation, actualization of Metacognition (only learned of this word in the past twenty five years)  thinking about what you think about....always being a skeptic to why you are doing what you are doing...takes intellectually honesty...and if you don't like knowing your foibles....don't venture in to this world.
Self Esteem depends on it.
My first understanding of humanity was a child being ridiculed.  Growing up with the sons and daughters of Lawyers and Doctors....(see I capitalize...for that is how I saw them)  a first generation Italian whose parents now living across the street, the street in the best side of town that never before saw low income housing.  1950..things were changing,..fast...
   I learned in the 50's that it was income, NOT color or ANYTHING else that separated people.  

We didn't have money to speak of ..my father a union laborer...working seasonally and my mother a garment worker of highest regard...but still a garment worker in sweat shops...working three jobs..
  Children were cruel,...and I understood early...it isn't factual what they say...I would say to myself, I think they must be making themselves feel better than they really do.....
of course I would come to learn of Alinsky and the tactics used by him...in Rules for Radicals...but I knew first hand..for so very long..
Always reject overtly or covertly that which is JIVE.
Life went on...but to the pop culture again that I will add is America's Poison Pill. Victimization and the pop culture value it had on "COOL" became the tactic used early with exponential growth thoughout the 20th century....
    Queen for a Day..a iconic, black and white tv show...when the total population of America had only three choices this would be one of them....showing for the FIRST TIME...the value of being a victim.  The pity card played competitively to earn a measly room of furniture...the right to be crowned Queen for a Day and a walk down the runway of shame and self pity is how I saw it as a 6, 7 8year old...."My mother would never do that," I would think.....yep...been watching it inch by inch for all these years..
Queen for a Day was an American radio and television game show that helped to usher in American listeners' and viewers' fascination with big-prize giveaway shows. Queen for a Day originated on the Mutual Radio Network on April 30, 1945, in New York City before moving to Los Angeles a few months later and ran until 1957. The show then ran on NBC Television from 1956 to 1964.[1])

MY RESUME is my EXPERIENCE and lessons learned I am who I am...not in spite of my experience but BECAUSE of them....."survival of the fittest" is ....
Graduated High School 1968
Viet-nam vet 68-71
First arrest senior year
2nd to fifth arrest first year in army
Vietnam 69-70 17 years old
First drug use...on leave from basis training...grass...
First Heroin use   in Viet-nam...
Release in Army narrowly missing a court martial
1971-85 Low life, career criminal, drug addict...dozen prisons several states....never more than 24 months at a time but in and out...constantly
1985 out for the last time...Health Club Fitness center sales into managment..
Won top performer first trip as an award...and a new experience of Tony
Started an advertising publishing company...and print show...25 years kept 15 people employed...took a few years before I had more than a handful.


The ExCONservative Radio Hour - 600 two hour shows 2009-2012
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/tony-venuti/2010/10/06/tony-venuti--ex-conservative-radio-show
Written by an observer 
http://opeds.com/2011/03/01/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-venuti/

Media Pros...Disclose your political affiliatlion Who did YOU vote for?

                       Full Disclosure..  Who did YOU vote for?

Should MEDIA "pros"......in the spirit of FULL Disclosure disclose their POLITICAL affiliation.


Should they be compelled to tell US who THEY voted for?

Why won't they? 
Seems to ME...that it makes ABSOLUTE sense...for ....if we don't have a basis point in which to analyze what media analysis is trying to tell us..,,,
Joe McCarthy warned us of the Media's

When I ask those who ASK me...the same question they ask....and the response is...."I don't disclose..."...MY RESPONSE....

I DON'T TRUST those that don't trust me with their truth.....PERIOD...simple, stupid....

My name is Tucker, NOT Sucker


 

In January 1998, Editor & Publisher, the preeminent media trade magazine, conducted a poll of 167 newspaper editors across the country. Investor’s Business Daily reporter Matthew Robinson obtained complete poll results, highlights of which were featured in the MRC’s February 1998 MediaWatch.
KEY FINDINGS:
  • In 1992, when just 43 percent of the public voted Democrat Bill Clinton for President, 58 percent of editors surveyed voted for him.
  • In 1996, a minority (49 percent) of the American people voted to reelect Clinton, compared to a majority (57 percent) of the editors.
  • When asked “How often do journalists’ opinions influence coverage?” a solid majority of the editors (57 percent) conceded it “sometimes” happens while another 14 percent said opinions “often” influence news coverage. In contrast, only one percent claim it “never” happens, and 26 percent say personal views “seldom” influence coverage.

New York Times columnist John Tierney surveyed 153 campaign journalists at a press party at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston. Although it was not a scientific sampling, Tierney found a huge preference for Democratic Senator John Kerry over incumbent Republican President George W. Bush, particular among journalists based in Washington, D.C. He found that journalists from outside Washington preferred Kerry by a three-to-one margin, while those who work inside the Beltway favored Kerry’s election by a 12-to-1 ratio.
KEY FINDINGS:


 Bill O'Reilly and Bob Beckel...."It Doesn't make a Difference..." says Beckel

Watch Beckel deny reality.
BILL O'REILLY: You're dodging my question. Do you believe there are no Republican or conservative journalists that are qualified to hold those positions?

BOB BECKEL: I certainly think there are, sure. But I don't care if there are not.

O'REILLY: Why don't you care?

BECKEL: I don't think it matters. I don't think it sends the news one way or the other.

O'REILLY: So if all of the network anchors were Republican conservatives it wouldn't bother you?

BECKEL: Oh, I'd be complaining about--all of the time just like the Republicans complain.

O'REILLY: You're making my point. You're making my point.

BECKEL: They happen to be there. They got hired. They went up and worked their way up the ranks for the most part and they got their jobs.

O'REILLY: Now wait a minute They didn't work their way up the ranks with all due respect to most of them. They were appointed to that position. That is a subjective position. I worked in network news, and I know that promotions were given to people based upon their political leanings and based upon how they conducted themselves in the politically correct atmosphere in which they work.

BECKEL: Are you suggesting these people got their jobs because they were liberal Democrats? If so, you have got the greatest lawsuit going there in the history of mankind.

O'REILLY: There's no lawsuit there because you can't prove it. I will suggest to you, and I know it's true that some of the people that are promoted at the network level are promoted because of political correctness, absolutely that is the case.

BECKEL: If can you believe that's absolutely the case --

O'REILLY: Wait a minute. We just documented to you, every single one of those people being liberal or a Democrat. Every -- except for Scott Pelley, I honestly can't say what Scott Pelley is. But we just documented that to you. Do you think that's a coincidence?

BECKEL: Do I think it's a coincidence?

O'REILLY: Yeah.

BECKEL:Do I think the pool of people that they pick from are overwhelmingly Democrat? Sure! But what difference does it make?

O'REILLY: Well wait a minute. Your contention is it doesn't make a difference.

BECKEL: I don't think it makes a difference at all.
- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/10/24/beckel-network-anchors-overwhelmingly-democrat-doesnt-make-differe#sthash.Edabm8Nr.dpuf


Watch Beckel deny reality.
BILL O'REILLY: You're dodging my question. Do you believe there are no Republican or conservative journalists that are qualified to hold those positions?

BOB BECKEL: I certainly think there are, sure. But I don't care if there are not.

O'REILLY: Why don't you care?

BECKEL: I don't think it matters. I don't think it sends the news one way or the other.

O'REILLY: So if all of the network anchors were Republican conservatives it wouldn't bother you?

BECKEL: Oh, I'd be complaining about--all of the time just like the Republicans complain.

O'REILLY: You're making my point. You're making my point.

BECKEL: They happen to be there. They got hired. They went up and worked their way up the ranks for the most part and they got their jobs.

O'REILLY: Now wait a minute They didn't work their way up the ranks with all due respect to most of them. They were appointed to that position. That is a subjective position. I worked in network news, and I know that promotions were given to people based upon their political leanings and based upon how they conducted themselves in the politically correct atmosphere in which they work.

BECKEL: Are you suggesting these people got their jobs because they were liberal Democrats? If so, you have got the greatest lawsuit going there in the history of mankind.

O'REILLY: There's no lawsuit there because you can't prove it. I will suggest to you, and I know it's true that some of the people that are promoted at the network level are promoted because of political correctness, absolutely that is the case.

BECKEL: If can you believe that's absolutely the case --

O'REILLY: Wait a minute. We just documented to you, every single one of those people being liberal or a Democrat. Every -- except for Scott Pelley, I honestly can't say what Scott Pelley is. But we just documented that to you. Do you think that's a coincidence?

BECKEL: Do I think it's a coincidence?

O'REILLY: Yeah.

BECKEL:Do I think the pool of people that they pick from are overwhelmingly Democrat? Sure! But what difference does it make?

O'REILLY: Well wait a minute. Your contention is it doesn't make a difference.

BECKEL: I don't think it makes a difference at all.
- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/10/24/beckel-network-anchors-overwhelmingly-democrat-doesnt-make-differe#sthash.Edabm8Nr.dpuf

 
Picketing the Media see Power of Ten


Beckel: Network Anchors Overwhelmingly Democrat, But 'Doesn't Make Difference At All'





Player, please . . . Does liberal pundit Bob Beckel care about his credibility?  Apparently not. Beckel has admitted that the pool of network anchors is "overwhelmingly Democrat," but somehow argues that "it doesn't make a difference at all."  Riiight.

Beckel appeared on this evening's O'Reilly Factor after host Bill had documented chapter and verse that every leading network anchor with the possible exception of Scott Pelley is a confirmed liberal or Democrat.  But Beckel refused to admit the undeniable--that this affects the nature of their coverage.  "I don't think it matters.  I don't think it sends the news one way or another." This despite also admitting that if the tables were turned and virtually all the anchors were Republican, he'd be complaining about it "all the time." View the video after the jump.


Watch Beckel deny reality.
BILL O'REILLY: You're dodging my question. Do you believe there are no Republican or conservative journalists that are qualified to hold those positions?

BOB BECKEL: I certainly think there are, sure. But I don't care if there are not.

O'REILLY: Why don't you care?

BECKEL: I don't think it matters. I don't think it sends the news one way or the other.

O'REILLY: So if all of the network anchors were Republican conservatives it wouldn't bother you?

BECKEL: Oh, I'd be complaining about--all of the time just like the Republicans complain.

O'REILLY: You're making my point. You're making my point.

BECKEL: They happen to be there. They got hired. They went up and worked their way up the ranks for the most part and they got their jobs.

O'REILLY: Now wait a minute They didn't work their way up the ranks with all due respect to most of them. They were appointed to that position. That is a subjective position. I worked in network news, and I know that promotions were given to people based upon their political leanings and based upon how they conducted themselves in the politically correct atmosphere in which they work.

BECKEL: Are you suggesting these people got their jobs because they were liberal Democrats? If so, you have got the greatest lawsuit going there in the history of mankind.

O'REILLY: There's no lawsuit there because you can't prove it. I will suggest to you, and I know it's true that some of the people that are promoted at the network level are promoted because of political correctness, absolutely that is the case.

BECKEL: If can you believe that's absolutely the case --

O'REILLY: Wait a minute. We just documented to you, every single one of those people being liberal or a Democrat. Every -- except for Scott Pelley, I honestly can't say what Scott Pelley is. But we just documented that to you. Do you think that's a coincidence?

BECKEL: Do I think it's a coincidence?

O'REILLY: Yeah.

BECKEL:Do I think the pool of people that they pick from are overwhelmingly Democrat? Sure! But what difference does it make?

O'REILLY: Well wait a minute. Your contention is it doesn't make a difference.

BECKEL: I don't think it makes a difference at all.
- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/10/24/beckel-network-anchors-overwhelmingly-democrat-doesnt-make-differe#sthash.Edabm8Nr.dpuf