I work "in the presumptive"...I know what I know, I know what I don't know.
I trust in my intuit, and allow logic, reason and deduction, guided by experience on the dark side to be the only Master.
Pervulitis is a psychological brain disease brought on by having it
too easy....Persons not affected by such disease, for example is a "boy
named sue" his lack of not having it easy precluded "perv" infection...
PervUcation taught by Perversionists visionaries called Pervisionaries...
Coming soon Perv-A-Pedia....explaining the new IMmoral code and it's language...
per·vert·ed
/pərˈvərtid/
Adjective
(of a person or their actions) Characterized by sexually abnormal and unacceptable practices or tendencies.
(of a thing) Having been corrupted or distorted from its original course, meaning, or state.
Not understanding the 80/20 rule is not to understand LIBERALISM...
It is a fact that ONLY 20% do 80% - these folk make the world happen,...
AND that 80% do the remaining 20%....
the land of the malCONTENTs...by definition.
NOW the leftist elitists KNOW this to be so....they love the malcontent to gain MOB RULE...to gin up these malcontent, get them all to agree to agree as a MOB or else you will be shunned...
This is LIBERALISM 101...# ParetosPrinciple
again...NOT to understand this is NOT to understand....the why of liberalism....err POPULARITY see # popularized
Meanwhile, "The Many" remaining does maybe 1/5 to 1/10th...
as I suggest...creates a human emotion called JEALOUSY...bear with me..
Envy > Jealousy > = Hate....is HUMAN....without Emotional Intelligence part of equation
now ADD to this recipe...
Evil, albeit brilliant mind like Karl Marx...
who well understands this Human Nature..
Marx comes up with the paradigm that understands the "sum of it's parts are greater than the whole" Marx then took the Many that does LITTLE..... (knowing he can actualize his scheme, scam) by helping stupid, uneducated and indoctrinated people to believe that those that have the talent and the ambition is simply NOT FAIR....shame on them for not Tying the soccer game, ...what are they doing WINNING?
The Father of Factuals suggest the followingl.
Benoît Mandelbrot writes:
One of Pareto's equations achieved special prominence, and
controversy. He was fascinated by problems of power and wealth. How do
people get it? How is it distributed around society? How do those who
have it use it? The gulf between rich and poor has always been part of
the human condition, but Pareto resolved to measure it. He gathered
reams of data on wealth and income through different centuries, through
different countries: the tax records of Basel, Switzerland, from 1454
and from Augsburg, Germany, in 1471, 1498 and 1512; contemporary rental
income from Paris; personal income from Britain, Prussia, Saxony,
Ireland, Italy, Peru. What he found – or thought he found – was
striking. When he plotted the data on graph paper, with income on one
axis, and number of people with that income on the other, he saw the
same picture nearly everywhere in every era. Society was not a "social
pyramid" with the proportion of rich to poor sloping gently from one
class to the next. Instead it was more of a "social arrow" – very fat on
the bottom where the mass of men live, and very thin at the top where
sit the wealthy elite. Nor was this effect by chance; the data did not
remotely fit a bell curve, as one would expect if wealth were
distributed randomly. "It is a social law", he wrote: something "in the
nature of man".
They are so afraid of people discovering their sexuality and
realizing that no one is born a homosexual and learning that they can
actually change if they want to,” said Greg Quinlan about the issue
raised by a recent episode of CBS’ “Criminal Minds.”
“It is for this reason that they preach against us with such hate and
venom, attacking us for exercising our right of self-determination,” he
said. The heart of the issue is that if people who leave the homosexual
lifestyle exist, it disproves the assumption that some are born
homosexual and cannot change, the prevailing belief in the homosexual
community. Sparking the comments was a recent episode of “Criminal Minds” that
featured a team of FBI profilers that investigates serial killers. In
the Feb. 20 episode, titled “Broken,” a serial killer is murdering women
and homosexual men in what appears to be a series of sex crimes. The episode makes a startling claim as the killer is a person who
received conversion therapy as a young man to overcome homosexual
attractions. According to the characters in the show, the therapy
caused him to believe that acting on his same-sex attraction is wrong.
This belief causes him to violently attack people, because he is
conflicted about his sexual orientation.
She noted there is a real danger from attempts by homosexual activists to demonize ex-”gays” and conversion therapists. “These groups do not care about kids, all they care about is their
agenda and whatever they have to do to manipulate people into committing
violence against the Christian community. Their goal is to make people
who were thinking about supporting conversion counseling to no longer
support it,” she said. Harvey said ex-”gays” and Christians should call the network and
demand an apology for the inaccurate portrayal of conversion therapy and
the ex-”gay” movement. “It’s beyond jaw-dropping how full of lies this episode is. It is
harmful, insulting and people need to call the network demanding an
apology to the Christian community and all of the ex-homosexuals out of
there who’ve successfully left this lifestyle,” she said. “If they’re
going to do a show on this, they need to also do a show on the harm done
by groups like PFLAG and others who were pushing children into the
homosexual lifestyle.” The SPLC appears to agree with the premise of the show. On the
website the group declares that conversion therapy is “a dangerous
practice” and can have “devastating consequences. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/network-blasted-for-demonizing-ex-gays/#kUYS1OoJRtS5q7lt.99
A California Senate committee recently advanced a bill that would
protect citizens from having to undergo controversial "ex-gay" therapy, Think Progress reported.
The
legislation does not directly outlaw "ex-gay" therapy (also known as
conversion therapy) but states that anyone under the age of 18 is
prohibited from receiving "sexual orientation change efforts." The law
also requires patients to sign an "informed consent form," which has a
disclaimer. "Having a lesbian, gay, or bisexual sexual
orientation is not a mental disorder. There is no scientific evidence
that any types of therapies are effective in changing a person’s sexual
orientation," the disclaimer reads. "Sexual orientation change efforts
can be harmful. The risks include, but are not limited to, depression,
anxiety, and self-destructive behavior.
Having grown up with a tough love Mother, it was often that I heard stated..."I'm not your friend, I'm your Mother, you young man, will remember that...and when you are out of the house at 18, able to care for yourself, we might become friends....but I will always be your Mother first...is that understood? ah yeah ma..."don't ma Me".....do you understand? Yes, Ma...! Good. Responsibility, or Duty to be a successful parent is the Duty of all who brings life into the world. That said, good luck...down hill for so many years...but to my point...
The Political Class...the Politicians.... Republican vs Democrat, not republican and democrat...by nature it is a push, pull, that precludes the ability to be "friends."
The notion that an adversary one moment and a friend the next moment...says one of two things. You are either not a good friend, or, you are not a good adversary. It's disingenuous, at best, and more than likely, an absolute fabrication....Liberalism has made in unpopular to "fight."
I believe this is consistent with the politically correct approach to everything which often is counter-intuitive to the logical progression of thought. It falls in line with everyone tying in a ball game rather than anyone winning....which falls in line with the socialist, "Poorer becoming poorer is fine as long as the rich become less rich. "
