Monday, February 25, 2013

20% of earners pay 80% of taxes...see Pareto's Principle or the 80/20 Rule, rules!

The genesis of # mobRule

Not understanding the 80/20 rule is not to understand LIBERALISM...

It is a fact that ONLY 20% do 80% - these folk make the world happen,...

AND that 80% do the remaining 20%....
the land of the definition.

NOW the leftist elitists KNOW this to be so....they love the malcontent to gain MOB gin up these malcontent, get them all to agree to agree as a MOB or else you will be shunned...

This is LIBERALISM 101...# ParetosPrinciple

again...NOT to understand this is NOT to understand....the why of liberalism....err POPULARITY see # popularized

# landOFmore #landOFnotENOUGH # landOFjustENOUGH
# popularized
Those that do VS. those that don't >  
squared by those that don't know they don't know......

The 80/20 rule suggests whether it is 80/20, 90/10, or 95/5 it is the Few that do MOST of the work,

2015....1% paid 50% of taxes....20% paid 80%...this is a perfect example
80% do 20%...20% DO 80%...the Human Condition, IMPOSSIBLE to re-Condition though liberals try

Here are the numbers. You'll be stunned. The overwhelming majority of federal income taxes are paid by the very highest income earners. The top 1% of income earners pay about 32% of all income taxes. The top 5% pays 51.4%. The top 10% of high income earners, pay 63.5%. The top 20% of income earners pays 78% of all federal income taxes. The top 20%.

Meanwhile,  "The Many" remaining does maybe 1/5 to 1/10th...

as I suggest...creates a human emotion called JEALOUSY...bear with me..

Envy > Jealousy > = HUMAN....without Emotional Intelligence part of equation

now ADD to this recipe... 

Evil, albeit brilliant mind like Karl Marx...

who well understands this Human Nature..

Marx comes up with the paradigm that understands the "sum of it's parts are greater than the whole" 
 Marx then took the Many that does LITTLE.....
(knowing he can actualize his scheme, scam) by helping stupid, uneducated and indoctrinated people to believe that those that have the talent and the ambition is simply NOT FAIR....shame on them for not Tying the soccer game, ...what are they doing WINNING?

The Father of Factuals suggest the followingl.
BenoƮt Mandelbrot writes:
One of Pareto's equations achieved special prominence, and
controversy. He was fascinated by problems of power and wealth. How do
people get it? How is it distributed around society? How do those who
have it use it? The gulf between rich and poor has always been part of
the human condition, but Pareto resolved to measure it. He gathered
reams of data on wealth and income through different centuries, through
different countries: the tax records of Basel, Switzerland, from 1454
and from Augsburg, Germany, in 1471, 1498 and 1512; contemporary rental
income from Paris; personal income from Britain, Prussia, Saxony,
Ireland, Italy, Peru. What he found – or thought he found – was
striking. When he plotted the data on graph paper, with income on one
axis, and number of people with that income on the other, he saw the
same picture nearly everywhere in every era. Society was not a "social
pyramid" with the proportion of rich to poor sloping gently from one
class to the next. Instead it was more of a "social arrow" – very fat on
the bottom where the mass of men live, and very thin at the top where
sit the wealthy elite. Nor was this effect by chance; the data did not
remotely fit a bell curve, as one would expect if wealth were
distributed randomly. "It is a social law", he wrote: something "in the
nature of man".

No comments:

Post a Comment